| Re: More Annoying Conspiracy Stuff
It isn't a diagram of how the towers fell, it's a diagram showing that at 23 degrees of tilt the centre of mass remains within the footprint of the tower.
YES i have issues with the governments of both countries using terrorism as an excuse to encroach on our civil liberties.
But flapping your arms and saying "the towers were blown up by the FBI and I can prove it: look, some dust went at a funny angle" is counterproductive in convincing people that there's some substance to your cause.
I really, really, genuinely DO understand the principles involved here better than 1or2posts. It boils down to the fact that in BOTH intentional controlled demolitions and the destruction of the WTC EXACTLY THE SAME THING HAPPENS and NOBODY IS DENYING THAT POINT:
*******in both cases, buildings fall because the structural supports are weakened*******
whether it's by semtex or an airplane, the vertical pillars are weakened, and the weight of the building makes it crash down. The explosives used by demolition experts don't "blow up" the building, they remove it's ability to stay up, just like the planes did.
And since the exact same thing happens in both these cases, you will never, ever convince anyone that it must have been one and not the other... especially when six billion people have seen the planes weaken those vertical supports by obliterating them at 450 mph.
Look to more fruitful lines of atttack, this avenue is closed, you'll make no progress here.
__________________  | 
