Quote:
Originally Posted by StuntGirl  I'm not being funny, but whatever happened to "innocent before proven guilty". One of the boys is still denying murderous involvement and in group attacks you cant always tar everyone with the same brush. I'm not condoning what they did, but I think your moralist stance is oversimplifying things somewhat. |
If someone genuinely wasn't involved, then they're by definition not at fault.
But the boy in question, according to the article, started the violence by aiming a flying kick to the head of his victim.
Whether or not he intended to kill anyone, he still did that - Something else there's absolutely no excuse for.
The fact that his victim subsequently died just makes his actions all the worse.
