Quote:
Originally Posted by LesMTS  You don't have to accept the status quo, I never said that you did. But asking "why change things?" rather than "why maintain things as they are?" is always the better way for this type of argument to proceed, as it gives direction and purpose. |
Questioning the justification of people who want to keep things the way they are, other than simply "well it
is the way things are, and it's awrite", seems an entirely legitimate endevour. You seemed to suggest it was futile in some way.
That said: we can't really seperate the arguments for keeping the union from those for disolving it, they are two sides of the same coin really.
