Quote:
Originally Posted by karbon14  he took offence to ross saying "did gary glitter have a car boot sale?" if you fail to understand what is a very simple concept that has nothing to do with pedophilia or child abuse what chance do you have anywhere on the internet? he infered a meaning, and took serious offence to something that wasn't there.
there were questions on his sex, which he seemed to answer quite the thing, tam was quite honest and open about it and not abusive.
andrew edited a picture to show gary glitters head in his outfit. again, nothing to do with child abuse or pedophillia and yet he took it that way. as i read this there was little to no abuse untill he decided to leave.
this has all spawned out of a person persuming ross called him a peado. how are we supposed to deal with someone not understanding what someone else is saying? |
the discussion has gone beyond this one user, as I am sure you know. My comments, as with other most recent comments, are generalised rather than specific to this one user.
