| Notices | Welcome to the Altnation forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |  | |
15th August 2008, 3:41am
|
| | Dean Keenan Fan Club
Join Date: May 2001 Location: ail symudiad
Posts: 22,819
| Dr. Dolescum You know, as I write this, I am kinda on benefits in two different countries and have also dodged tax in two different countries in the last few weeks. There are no things to be proud of nor are they anything to be ashamed of. The money that "scum" like me costs the government is the equivalent to having a pish in Loch Lomond. In fact it's worse than that because I go swimming in Loch Lomond sometimes and, deep down, I'm a very selfish man and don't want to swim in your pish.
So while we spend £1billion a year on the illegal war in Iraq, the "energy industry" goes out of it's way to take turns raising prices while you lot fork out for their over priced black oil AND the war which was started so we can get more of it. We have billionaires, millionaires and "British" companies that have so many offshore accounts and accountants scouring the world for loopholes in tax law so that even someone who's spent most their adult life watching...
__________________
Last edited by triggerhappy; 11th March 2009 at 1:46am.
|
| |
1st September 2008, 9:48pm
|
| | Burning the bandwagon
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 335
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Quote: |
Originally Posted by ¡Punk! So while we spend £1billion a year on the illegal war in Iraq, the "energy industry" goes out of it's way to take turns raising prices while you lot fork out for their over priced black oil AND the war which was started so we can get more of it. We have billionaires, millionaires and "British" companies that have so many offshore accounts and accountants scouring the world for loopholes in tax law so that even someone who's spent most their adult life watching... | You are not on a righteous crusade of any kind.
Nothing you do by these directions can be justified as good.
You are not by doing this, "sticking it to the man".
Stop trying to do so.
You are a social leech.
You are a waste of space.
Get a job.
Grow up.
Or go live in a whole and leave your leeched benefits for those the system is in place to actually help. You are impeading them from doing so. |
| |
1st September 2008, 9:52pm
|
| | Slave To The Rhythm
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Govanhill
Posts: 8,229
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxglove
I felt it was an article that should be published to allow discussion on a subject that some people don't think is an issue or a problem (for the record I don't think it is in any way right to cheat the benefits system) and to allow for free debate. | But haven't we already had this discussion many, many times in several of Mick's threads over the past year or two? And every thread follows the same pattern - posts patting Mick on the back and angry posts telling him to get a job then it just decends into a complete farce (as most Altnation threads do these days). I'd be surprised if there was a single active member of Altnation who doesn't know what Mick was up to. Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxglove Anyone following the suggestions made in the article would have to be a fool. Anyone feeling it would be OK to do so because it is an article on Alternative Nation is an even bigger fool. | Maybe so, but it's still not exactly responsible of Altnation to publish an article like this, "personal account" or not. Quote:
Originally Posted by endless psych It seems prudent to mention the only thing that appears to actually be illegal in the entire article is avoiding paying council tax.
Oh and housing benefit. | Last time I checked it was also illegal not to pay your TV license.
Last edited by Pier Angeli; 1st September 2008 at 9:55pm.
Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|
| |
1st September 2008, 9:55pm
|
| | Experimental stooge
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Auld Reekie
Posts: 15,133
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Quote:
Originally Posted by Pier Angeli Last time I checked it was also illegal not to pay your TV license. | True. Thats a grand total of three illegal things the majority of the article still being about how to work the system to your advantage.
(Its also illegal to be drunk in a pub. I look forward to posts of moral indignation in future subcrawl threads.) |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:00pm
|
| | Frankly my dear.....  Editor
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Paradise City
Posts: 11,668
| Re: Dr. Dolescum As far as I am aware not paying a tv licence is not illegal, but if you watch TV programmes as they are broadcast and don't have a licence, that is illegal. I know, it is a fine point, but just felt it worth pointing out the correct position in relation to tv licences.
__________________ I want to teach the world, but not a song.
I need to tell them where they're going wrong:
To trust to serendipity not fate:
To just believe your heart and conjugate. |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:05pm
|
| | Slave To The Rhythm
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Govanhill
Posts: 8,229
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxglove As far as I am aware not paying a tv licence is not illegal, but if you watch TV programmes as they are broadcast and don't have a licence, that is illegal. I know, it is a fine point, but just felt it worth pointing out the correct position in relation to tv licences. | Well yeah, obviously that's what I meant. Quote: |
You need a TV Licence to use any television receiving equipment such as a TV set, digital box, DVD or video recorder, PC, laptop or mobile phone to watch or record television programmes as they're being shown on TV.
| Clearly Mick watches TV yet doesn't pay his TV Licence. |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:07pm
|
| | Experimental stooge
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Auld Reekie
Posts: 15,133
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Yeah it would be fair to assume that. Otherwise why would he even mention it? |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:10pm
|
| | Hammer Smashed Face
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Airstrip One
Posts: 29,026
| Re: Dr. Dolescum It's true that multiple wrongs don't make a right. We all know this. The key point to me is that when we direct all manner of opprobrium at Mick for depriving poor innocents of their state benefits, and the government and the media draw attention to how benefit fraud is threatening the very core of civilised society or other such pish, we hit the wrong target.
While we do this, those with the money to get away with it use every trick in the book to avoid paying their fair share, and the government is complicit in this by allowing loopholes and tax avoidance.
Yes, what Mick does is wrong, legally and morally, and costs the system money. When a big corporation avoids a metric shitload of tax, it's legal but wrong morally. Comparing the two, I know which costs the system more, and I know which is more wrong by a country mile. |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:13pm
|
| | Burning the bandwagon
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 335
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Quote: |
Originally Posted by Semprini The key point to me is that when we direct all manner of opprobrium at Mick for depriving poor innocents of their state benefits, and the government and the media draw attention to how benefit fraud is threatening the very core of civilised society or other such pish, we hit the wrong target.
While we do this, those with the money to get away with it use every trick in the book to avoid paying their fair share, and the government is complicit in this by allowing loopholes and tax avoidance. |
You are, of course assuming we are not bashing him and saving the economy at the same time.
MULTITASK!!!!! |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:16pm
|
| | Experimental stooge
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Auld Reekie
Posts: 15,133
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Well I would have thought Semps line of argument is that we aren't saving the economy at the same time because, you know, cleary we aren't. |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:20pm
|
| | Burning the bandwagon
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 335
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Indeed, lazy arse continues to distract us.
I hope you're all happy.
Bastards. |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:25pm
|
| | Experimental stooge
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Auld Reekie
Posts: 15,133
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Actually I wonder if the reactions might be down to how "morals" (as such) work.
Objectively benefit fraud is a small problem perpetrated by a very small minority of people yet its nearly always reported in a sensationalist tone to (objective) over reactions.
Objectively corporations get away with much worse but the reactions are far less. Indeed people reacting against these things get accussed of being lefty liberal wishy washy types (and other such rhetoric).
I can't be because its "our money they are stealing" (through taxation and such) because if it was we'd be just as (if not more) offended and affronted by corporations doing such things. Because thats our money too.
Perhaps it stems from the fact its money we have to pay thats being misappropriated rather then money we choose to pay? |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:33pm
|
| | Made in the 80's.
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The best little Whorehouse near Tesco.
Posts: 11,365
| Re: Dr. Dolescum My reaction stems from Captain Cantwork being so blasé about being a tax-dodging fraudster.
I'd be mortified if I was such a complete waster, nevermind writing a 'look at me, look at me' article about it. |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:35pm
|
| | Experimental stooge
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Auld Reekie
Posts: 15,133
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Thing is objectively companies do far worse and are far more blase about it. They have annual share holders dinners to celebrate how much they've avoided paying taxes (to a degree anyway).
Yet in general people will more likely climb on their high horse about people defrauding the benefits system. The same seems to be true when the government tenders out a contract to Crapita or similar incompetent companies. |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:37pm
|
| | Dean Keenan Fan Club
Join Date: May 2001 Location: ail symudiad
Posts: 22,819
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Did no-one read the end of the article?
__________________ |
| |
1st September 2008, 10:40pm
|
| | Should Be Working
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Woodlands
Posts: 16,573
| Re: Dr. Dolescum Quote:
Originally Posted by ¡Punk! Did no-one read the end of the article? | No, their bosses walked in and caught them skiving on the forum before they finished. |
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |