| Notices | Welcome to the Altnation forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Current Affairs, Debate & Politics Everyone has an opinion so why not post it here and let's get a debate going. |  | |
21st April 2008, 4:03pm
|
#106 | | Athiest Otter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,566
| Re: End gay blood ban.
__________________ Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like hard work. Thomas Edison. |
| |
21st April 2008, 4:04pm
|
#107 | | Experimental stooge
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Muffled 'bang'
Posts: 13,117
| Re: End gay blood ban. Quote:
Originally Posted by J.M so because homo is derived from homosexual it is ok to say it if you gay but not if your straight? | Thats the gist of it yes. If you can't understand why its because the striaight majority used to persecute homosexuals often using homo as a means of offence. If you can't understand why that makes it at least hard for a heterosexual personage to use the term homo in a jocular manner then it would be a waste of my time and yours continuing this tangent. Quote: |
what would be the case then for someone from scotland =scot someone from pakistan?
| Well the Scots choose to be called Scots by and large. Folks from Pakistan had their nationality thrust upon them. Also 'Jocks' has tended to be the preferred derogatory term for Scottish folk as oppossed to Scot. Quote: |
the hypocrisy exists when a homo walks past a junkie and then says fuckin junkie! or look at that dirty prozzie! but if the junkie turns round and retorts with "fucking homo" its some moral injustice?
| Which of course is exactly what you meant when you posted the first time and is of complete relevance... 
__________________ Shut up! Grammatic oil!
Just a sockpuppet for Freud. Whats happened to my bag? Not down with the rock not down with the roll |
| |
21st April 2008, 4:08pm
|
#108 | | Cap'n Cherry
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 20,011
| Re: End gay blood ban. Quote:
Originally Posted by J.M bacterial infections should theoretically pose no risk however perhaps it is a precautionary measure to prevent viral infection?
if i get a needle stuck in me tomorrow when taking a bin out i would be a bit stupid to not get checked out immediately, however even after being checked out immediately I would be recommened i get checked on in 4 to 6 weeks to ensure no infection had occured!
doesnt it make sense if its possible an infection can be present but its too early stage to be detected - then assume it is and prevent spread? only a thought | That is completely beside the point I was making. I was saying that with reference to bacterial infection (as IYGN was told was the reason piercings had the waiting period), the 6/12 month period was completely arbritrary. Yes, there is a period of dormancy with regards to viral infections that should be taken into account, but if after 6 months a blood test is completely negative, shouldn't that also be taken into account? |
| |
21st April 2008, 4:12pm
|
#109 | | Lord
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Outside Glasgow
Posts: 413
| Re: End gay blood ban. so im not allowed to refer to those that cant be referred to as gay,bent,poof,homo......... incase they feel im using the word in a jocular manner? what words can i use without risk of upsetting them? even homosexual can sound derogatory
ho hum Quote:
Originally Posted by bikuki That is completely beside the point I was making. I was saying that with reference to bacterial infection (as IYGN was told was the reason piercings had the waiting period), the 6/12 month period was completely arbritrary. Yes, there is a period of dormancy with regards to viral infections that should be taken into account, but if after 6 months a blood test is completely negative, shouldn't that also be taken into account? | indeed, however i never replied as to contradict you only to offer a possible (and plausible) reason
Last edited by J.M; 21st April 2008 at 4:12pm.
Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|
| |
21st April 2008, 5:32pm
|
#110 | | Stop pissing me off...
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Cessnock
Posts: 1,288
| Re: End gay blood ban. Quote:
Originally Posted by J.M it is 12 months in scotland!  My point wasnt in reference to your post! the title of the thread is screamin prejudice! fed up with it! | How the hell is the thread title screaming prejudice? Its in direct response to an article on the news which called for an end to the current ban on non-infected homosexuals being denied the opportunity to donate blood.
It didn't reference any other "banned" group, only the homosexual community as the target of this particular campaign and I fail to see how the thread title "screams prejudice". |
| |
21st April 2008, 6:52pm
|
#111 | | Lord
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Outside Glasgow
Posts: 413
| Re: End gay blood ban. Quote:
Originally Posted by Puppy How the hell is the thread title screaming prejudice?..... only the homosexual community as the target of this particular campaign. | there isnt a ban on gay people donating blood! hence the title of this thread is wrong! There are however,regulations in place that decree that certain practices pose too great a risk and as a result said practictioners are prohibited from donating blood.
gay or not if you dont fit the criteria then you wont be allowed to donate.  |
| |
21st April 2008, 8:11pm
|
#112 | | Whoa Black Jesus
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Dixieland
Posts: 25,889
| Re: End gay blood ban. Seriously though, who'd want gay blood? |
| |
21st April 2008, 9:13pm
|
#113 | | Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Unsexy Manor
Posts: 6,403
| Re: End gay blood ban. Homophobes're more likely to be baying for gay blood, so let's leave off them, eh? |
| |
21st April 2008, 9:20pm
|
#114 | | This Is My Clone
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Glasgow
Posts: 6,441
| Re: End gay blood ban. Quote:
Originally Posted by Zippy Seriously though, who'd want gay blood? | Rather gay than black.
__________________ What's the point in happiness? It can't buy you money. |
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |
All times are GMT +0. The time now is 5:54am.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.