| Notices | Welcome to the Altnation forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Current Affairs, Debate & Politics Everyone has an opinion so why not post it here and let's get a debate going. |  | |
15th April 2008, 10:42am
|
#1 | | Stop pissing me off...
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Cessnock
Posts: 1,325
| End gay blood ban. Following on from a news snippet on t'news. Moves are afoot to try to overturn the ban on homosexual men donating blood. The blood transfusion service still does not recognise the small risk posed by gay men, even though HIV/AIDS rates in heterosexuals are higher than those in the gay community apparently. http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Ca...gay.3980676.jp
What are your thoughts on this? Would you be happy to accept blood from a gay man?
Personally I don't care. It passes the screening its good for me. |
| |
15th April 2008, 10:44am
|
#2 | | Fattly Drawn Boy SuperMod
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Dundee
Posts: 16,690
| Re: End gay blood ban. Yeah, it's all screened anyway. I don't see what the problem is.
__________________ If Schrodinger had a cat, it would definitely be dead by now. |
| |
15th April 2008, 10:45am
|
#3 | | Loa Of Death
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The Crossroads
Posts: 5,035
| Re: End gay blood ban. But what if it turns you gay?
__________________ PETRO VOODOO |
| |
15th April 2008, 10:47am
|
#4 | | Strong protect the weak Admin
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Glasgow
Posts: 28,195
| Re: End gay blood ban. Quote:
Originally Posted by Puppy Following on from a news snippet on t'news. Moves are afoot to try to overturn the ban on homosexual men donating blood. The blood transfusion service still does not recognise the small risk posed by gay men, even though HIV/AIDS rates in heterosexuals are higher than those in the gay community apparently. http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Ca...gay.3980676.jp
What are your thoughts on this? Would you be happy to accept blood from a gay man?
Personally I don't care. It passes the screening its good for me. | But the blood might turn me GAY!
Seriously not a problem in the slightest as you say if it passes the screening is there really any increased risk, unless the BTS have reasons to suggest there would be an increased risk. Though I'm unfamiliar is the ban on gay people giving blood or on anyone thats had anal sex?
__________________ Quote: |
Originally Posted by Spartacus Some people say he hasn't got feet but keeps a pair of dancing mice in his shoes instead...
Some people say he keeps a portrait in his attic which ages insead of him...
All we know, is he's called the Forbes | Sponsor Altnation
Buy games and Cd's at play to support us. |
| |
15th April 2008, 10:50am
|
#5 | | Loa Of Death
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The Crossroads
Posts: 5,035
| Re: End gay blood ban. To be fair, chances are you'd only turn half-gay. You'd probably have to experience your first boabing before becoming a full gay. Bit like The Lost Boys.
__________________ PETRO VOODOO |
| |
15th April 2008, 10:51am
|
#6 | | Lady Of War
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Hamelldaeme
Posts: 20,478
| Re: End gay blood ban. as far as im aware the ban on gay's giving blood stemmed from the AIDS/HIV in the 70's/80's, im unsure if its an anal sex thing though.
I dont care were the hell the blood comes from, everyone's blood is screened
__________________ Worth
Just because you're necessary doesn't mean you're important. Quote: |
Originally Posted by WJTM tell doogie, if he flashes his cock at me, ill shoot it, and im good with small moving targets | |
| |
15th April 2008, 10:53am
|
#7 | | borte, ikke glemt
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Glasgow
Posts: 6,009
| Re: End gay blood ban. It's a bit ridiculous really.
As has been said, there is a screening process for all blood that is donated, what's the problem?
__________________ 
If there's a new way, I'll be the first in line. But, it better work this time. |
| |
15th April 2008, 10:55am
|
#8 | | Lady Of War
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Hamelldaeme
Posts: 20,478
| Re: End gay blood ban. "Dr Brian McClelland, strategy director at ScotBlood, said: "This donor-selection rule is often misunderstood and perceived to be discriminatory. This is not the case.
"While the absolute number of cases of HIV in heterosexuals diagnosed annually is greater than for men who have had sex with men, when the size of the respective populations is taken into account it can be seen that the relative risk of exposure is very different."
He added: "Figures would indicate a man who has had sex with a man is seven times more likely to contract HIV than a heterosexual.
"Abolishing the rule for gay men would increase the risk of an HIV-infected donation entering the blood supply by about five times, and changing the rule to allow gay men to donate one year after they last had sex with a man would increase the risk by 60 per cent."" Mate this is 2008, it just smacks of homophobia
__________________ Worth
Just because you're necessary doesn't mean you're important. Quote: |
Originally Posted by WJTM tell doogie, if he flashes his cock at me, ill shoot it, and im good with small moving targets | |
| |
15th April 2008, 10:56am
|
#9 | | Better not to err
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Glesgae
Posts: 28,357
| Re: End gay blood ban. Hah, I didn't know they didn't allow homosexuals to donate blood.
What about bisexuals? Where do you draw the line?
Half-funny/half-ridiculous. |
| |
15th April 2008, 10:59am
|
#10 | | Meat Festival
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Unsexy Manor
Posts: 6,403
| Re: End gay blood ban. Quote:
Originally Posted by LesMTS Yeah, it's all screened anyway. I don't see what the problem is. | Maybe including high-risk blood in screening doesn't produce significant returns as to make the cost worthwhile? I honestly don't know, I'm just trying to understand.
__________________ Without evil there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Dario It's not easy being greasy, you know. | |
| |
15th April 2008, 11:01am
|
#11 | | says Addy
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Glasgow.
Posts: 12,438
| Re: End gay blood ban. Quote: |
Abolishing the rule for gay men would increase the risk of an HIV-infected donation entering the blood supply by about five times, and changing the rule to allow gay men to donate one year after they last had sex with a man would increase the risk by 60 per cent
| If those figures are true then no I wouldn't.
__________________ I saw a werewolf with a Chinese menu in his hand, walking through the streets of Soho in the rain.
He was looking for the place called Lee Ho Fook's. Going to get a big dish of beef chow mein. |
| |
15th April 2008, 11:15am
|
#12 | | Fattly Drawn Boy SuperMod
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Dundee
Posts: 16,690
| Re: End gay blood ban. Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie LiDeo Maybe including high-risk blood in screening doesn't produce significant returns as to make the cost worthwhile? I honestly don't know, I'm just trying to understand. | That's a good point, yeah. Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkMono Hah, I didn't know they didn't allow homosexuals to donate blood.
What about bisexuals? Where do you draw the line?
Half-funny/half-ridiculous. | It's not necessarily homosexuals, male bisexuals who had been sexually active with a male partner would also be excluded.
You're also completely excluded from giving blood if you've had sex with a native of certain countries (mostly in Africa).
They ask you a bunch of reasonably specific questions about your sex life (among other things) when you first go to give blood.
__________________ If Schrodinger had a cat, it would definitely be dead by now.
Last edited by LesMTS; 15th April 2008 at 11:15am.
Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|
| |
15th April 2008, 11:19am
|
#13 | | borte, ikke glemt
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Glasgow
Posts: 6,009
| Re: End gay blood ban. Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie LiDeo Maybe including high-risk blood in screening doesn't produce significant returns as to make the cost worthwhile? I honestly don't know, I'm just trying to understand. | But then, where do you draw the line at who is high risk etc? There are from many accounts increasing problems with numbers of the population affected by STIs and STDs in general. I'm kinda at a loose end to fathom why anyone who is gay would be any more/less susceptible than anyone who isn't.
And like Mark says, what of people who are bisexual?
Can of worms or what?
__________________ 
If there's a new way, I'll be the first in line. But, it better work this time. |
| |
15th April 2008, 11:21am
|
#14 | | Meat Festival
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Unsexy Manor
Posts: 6,403
| Re: End gay blood ban. See Les's post.
High-risk isn't limited to gay men.
__________________ Without evil there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Dario It's not easy being greasy, you know. | |
| |
15th April 2008, 11:22am
|
#15 | | (suicidemachine)
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Too large
Posts: 17,745
| Re: End gay blood ban. i've had a few blood transfusions and I wouldn't mind if i was upped to13% gay  |
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |