| Notices | Welcome to the Altnation forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Current Affairs, Debate & Politics Everyone has an opinion so why not post it here and let's get a debate going. |  | | 
29th April 2008, 6:01pm
|
#31 | | Holy Heart Failure!
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Gropecunt Lane.
Posts: 2,506
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote: |
Originally Posted by LesMTS Animals? I think some bestiality is wrong, but definitely not all of it. | May I ask you to elaborate on what you mean by "not all of it"?
__________________
"'Patronising', of course, means 'to talk down to people'." | 
|  | |
29th April 2008, 6:03pm
|
#32 | | Curiosity killed the twat SuperMod
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Dundee
Posts: 15,212
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dario  May I ask you to elaborate on what you mean by "not all of it"? | Well, I think if you're fucking a horse and the horse is disturbed by this fact, you're going to know about it pretty quickly. | 
| | |
29th April 2008, 6:04pm
|
#33 | | Experimental stooge
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Muffled 'bang'
Posts: 12,662
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dario May I ask you to elaborate on what you mean by "not all of it"? | 
__________________
Shut up! Grammatic oil!
Just a sockpuppet for Freud. Whats happened to my bag?
Not down with the rock not down with the roll | |
| | |
29th April 2008, 6:05pm
|
#34 | | Let's 'ave a sniff of it
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Unsexy Manor
Posts: 6,345
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by endless psych | Eurgh... what's wrong with its forehead?
__________________ Without evil there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Dario It's not easy being greasy, you know. | | |
| | |
29th April 2008, 6:08pm
|
#35 | | Filth-kitten
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,571
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by endless psych I suspect the research you aren't (I mean not to imply anything btw - it would just be nice to have links/references to geek out on) cite perhaps doesn't find any particular causative links or indeed particularly strong correlative ones either. | Due to a fuck-up by my computer last month I've lost a whole folder of links to various resources from both sides of the argument, or I'd have linked. Give me a few moments and I have a search and get back. I'll also try not to cite either Focus on the Family or zomgboobsareimmoral.org.
__________________  | |
| | |
29th April 2008, 6:12pm
|
#36 | | Holy Heart Failure!
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Gropecunt Lane.
Posts: 2,506
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by endless psych | What kind of self-respecting human being would allow themselves to be photographed sitting on such a tacky looking couch? Revolting.
__________________
"'Patronising', of course, means 'to talk down to people'." | |
| | |
29th April 2008, 6:37pm
|
#37 | | Experimental stooge
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Muffled 'bang'
Posts: 12,662
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mwezzi Due to a fuck-up by my computer last month I've lost a whole folder of links to various resources from both sides of the argument, or I'd have linked. Give me a few moments and I have a search and get back. I'll also try not to cite either Focus on the Family or zomgboobsareimmoral.org. | Theres no hurry, I'll be drinking tonight and likely not able to appreciate them anyhow. I'll still be interested to give them a look over - both sides even saves me buggering about on athens and the like huzzah!  Quote:
Originally Posted by Dario What kind of self-respecting human being would allow themselves to be photographed sitting on such a tacky looking couch? Revolting. | Does thoust tempt fate?
__________________
Shut up! Grammatic oil!
Just a sockpuppet for Freud. Whats happened to my bag?
Not down with the rock not down with the roll | |
| | |
29th April 2008, 6:48pm
|
#38 | | Filth-kitten
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,571
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by endless psych Theres no hurry, I'll be drinking tonight and likely not able to appreciate them anyhow. I'll still be interested to give them a look over - both sides even saves me buggering about on athens and the like huzzah! | If there's no rush that's even better, because since my first search for these things a year ago the internet is awash with religious God-says-it's-wrong moralising, Not-My-Nigel rants and uncited opinion articles which say nothing. This is turning out to be irritating. However, have this from the Lilith Report about lap dancing clubs and a rise in rape and sexual assault in their areas. Not one of my original sources but it's something, and it'll give you one reason often cited about the link between many forms of (not just violent) porn and violence: http://www.eaves4women.co.uk/Lilith_...viour_2007.pdf
__________________ | |
| | |
29th April 2008, 6:56pm
|
#39 | | Experimental stooge
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Muffled 'bang'
Posts: 12,662
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mwezzi If there's no rush that's even better, because since my first search for these things a year ago the internet is awash with religious God-says-it's-wrong moralising, Not-My-Nigel rants and uncited opinion articles which say nothing. This is turning out to be irritating. However, have this from the Lilith Report about lap dancing clubs and a rise in rape and sexual assault in their areas. Not one of my original sources but it's something, and it'll give you one reason often cited about the link between many forms of (not just violent) porn and violence: http://www.eaves4women.co.uk/Lilith_...viour_2007.pdf | I'll try and remember to have a gander on various psych, sociology type things theres bound to be one decent review article on the subject, hell the OU might even have an e-book or two on the subject...
__________________
Shut up! Grammatic oil!
Just a sockpuppet for Freud. Whats happened to my bag?
Not down with the rock not down with the roll | |
| | |
29th April 2008, 8:44pm
|
#40 | | Regret.com
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Wishaw
Posts: 16,191
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
When I finally get around to raping and killing someone I'm going to make sure the media reports that I obsessively watched Ben Affleck movies. See if we can get something rubbish banned for once.
__________________
I was talking when I should have been listening.
| |
| | |
29th April 2008, 9:09pm
|
#41 | | EVIL/NICE.
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Edinburgh.
Posts: 3,158
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
LesMTS: Fighting for the rights of paedophiles, necrophiliacs and bestiality. 
Bet he has one fucking kinky sex life...
__________________ 
Infidel to die for what I am doing,
Will happen in the morning,
When the mirror won't recognise me.
Last edited by Draven; 29th April 2008 at 9:10pm.
Reason: ps
| |
| | |
29th April 2008, 9:11pm
|
#42 | | Curiosity killed the twat SuperMod
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Dundee
Posts: 15,212
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draven LesMTS: Fighting for the rights of paedophiles, necrophiliacs and bestiality.
Bet he has one fucking kinky sex life... | I'll fight for their rights as long as they're hurting no-one,or making it easy for people to be hurt. | |
| | |
29th April 2008, 9:13pm
|
#43 | | EVIL/NICE.
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Edinburgh.
Posts: 3,158
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LesMTS I'll fight for their rights as long as they're hurting no-one,or making it easy for people to be hurt. | Didnae deny your kinky sex life mind. Actually changed my mind, this bill will sort out sexual deviants such as you!
__________________
Infidel to die for what I am doing,
Will happen in the morning,
When the mirror won't recognise me. | |
| | |
30th April 2008, 12:04am
|
#44 | | Purple Haze
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Cambuslang
Posts: 3,522
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Would this bill allow for the prosecution of directors/producers who make films that explore the realities of violent sexual behaviour, or use violent sexual behaviour as metaphor? Titilation is not the primary interest here, if it even is one at all. However, in light of previous tabloid-fuelled hysteria (Brass Eye, 'Video Nasties' etc) I could imagine many a censorship campaign riding on it's back, all facilitated by the bill seeming to suggest that the possible effects any work can have are as important as the verifiable ones.
__________________
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad - Anon. | |
| | |
30th April 2008, 12:59am
|
#45 | | Experimental stooge
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Muffled 'bang'
Posts: 12,662
| Re: Bill for "possession of violent and extreme pornography" to become law next week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by metallideth all facilitated by the bill seeming to suggest that the possible effects any work can have are as important as the verifiable ones. | Well if the bill relied upon verifiable effects then it would be on very shaky ground. Rather then the concrete structure of possible effects of course.
__________________
Shut up! Grammatic oil!
Just a sockpuppet for Freud. Whats happened to my bag?
Not down with the rock not down with the roll | |
| | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
| | |
