AM I Normal? BBC1

[crazydiamond85]

was some show on tonight and I know it was probably a repeat but this guy seriously gave me the fucking boke

YouTube - Lindsay Ashford Interview, Part 1 of 5

couldn't find any other vidoes of the interview he had on the show but this is an old 1


on the 1 for the BBC he said his ideal partner would be a 7-11 year old girl

thats fucking disgusting!!!

he also has a daughter....and the sick fuck said he'd let a grown man have asexual relationship with her when she was only 7

what the fuck is the world coming too?
seriously this cunt should be castrated or burned alive

sicksicksicksick

[Semprini]

I love the smell of rational thought in the morning.

[Zooropa]

I love the tears of innocent children in the morning.

[sjonit]

aye pure sicko, a childs body and mind just isnt able to deal with sex at the age of 7.

get him done for promoting paedophaelia.

[Draven]

Wonder when the "AltNation paedo protection" society will get up this morning to defend the guy. "No, no there's nothing wrong with it..." blah blah.

Sick. Fuck.

[karbon14]

it's his wean, he can do what he wants with her surely?

[sjonit]

Originally Posted by karbon14

it's his wean, he can do what he wants with her surely?

soliciting a minor...neh

forcing her to dress in pink...aye

[GreatKingRat]

Originally Posted by Draven

Wonder when the "AltNation paedo protection" society will get up this morning to defend the guy. "No, no there's nothing wrong with it..." blah blah.

Do we have a paedo protection society?

What the fuck are you talking about?

[Puppy]

I think they are suggesting that a balance or indeed lack of a knee-jerk "sick fuck burn the bastards slowly starting at the testicles" reaction is indicating you may be part of a "peado protection society".

Following on from "there is no room for debate" and "everyone must agree with the SUN/Daily mail"

[slicer]

Aye, c'mon but.

The guy is fucked in the head. The term "normal" is something I don't agree with (especially as a member of what would seem to be an alternative community), but the guy's ideas are devious and I'm sure we'd all agree are unnaceptable. Just wrong!

Not to sound all right-wing, I don't think that knee-jerk reactions are necessarily the way forward, but I'd be interested to hear, from people who consider themselves more rational, opinions on a suitable punishment for paedos and the likes.

[Draven]

Originally Posted by GreatKingRat

Do we have a paedo protection society?

What the fuck are you talking about?

Originally Posted by Puppy

I think they are suggesting that a balance or indeed lack of a knee-jerk "sick fuck burn the bastards slowly starting at the testicles" reaction is indicating you may be part of a "peado protection society".

Following on from "there is no room for debate" and "everyone must agree with the SUN/Daily mail"

I'm suggesting the usual suspects will come on here and make the same old arguments that are always made when paedophilia is brought up on this forum. Here's a direct quote from a previous thread on paedophilia:

I don't think it should necessarily be an offence in and of itself. Purchasing the pornography should probably be an offence, and certainly distributing and producing child pornography should be very serious offences (as they quite rightly are). But it's none of my business or anyone else's what someone wants to wank off to in their own home, no matter how repulsive we might find it.

Abelt this is more specifically about child pornography it does demonstrate what I mean, I will leave it to the original author to explain his views on this particular thread, but this is the sort of views that are commonly expressed on this forum. "If people do it in their own homes it's ok".

So to Puppy, no, it's nothing to do with knee-jerk Sun/Mail reaction (I love how this gets thrown around like an insult constantly here), it's more the fact I was awaiting the arrival of the usual suspects to argue that this man does not deserve scorn, and they express sympathy for him.

I think he's a sick fuck. Nothing anybody say in this thread will sway my opinion of that.

[TSR]

Do you think social services watches tv?
this guy does not deserve children

Originally Posted by GreatKingRat

Do we have a paedo protection society?

What the fuck are you talking about?

(Edited. Draven said it better and found the post/theread i was looking for)

[LesMTS]

Originally Posted by Draven

"If people do it in their own homes it's ok".

If you think that's the point I was making then you're way wide of the mark, but can be forgiven because a large number of otherwise intelligent, rational people seem to suffer from some kind of brain spasm when this subject is brought up.
That's one quote from a wider argument, the point of which was to put forward my opinion that what goes on in someone's head, whatever that may be, is morally neutral. Morally neutral doesn't necessarily mean they should be encouraged or that they shouldn't be discouraged, just that they shouldn't be subject to punishment.
No-one's sticking up for child abusers here.

Regarding the subject of this thread, he's obviously putting forward some opinions which definitely should be challenged, but he's neither been accused of nor charged with any crime and I think it's valuable (and fairly ballsy of him) that he's willing to articulately and rationally discuss his opinions. It's pretty sad that his willingness to do so is met with "yaaaaaahhhheeeeeeeaaaaargrgggghh BURN HIM, KILL HIM yeaaaarrrrrhhjjjjgghhh FROTH FROTH FROTH". We can learn from him and we're better placed to discourage and challenge him (and others with similar views) if we can sit and hear them out.
Then no-one needs to get burned, and we can save the wood for a barbeque.

In fact, I think anyone who would take satisfaction or enjoyment from seeing him burned is at least as fucked up in the head as he is himself. But, hey, as long as you're only imagining him being burned or talking about how ace it would be, I wouldn't want to see you punished for it.

So, anway, go ahead and misread all of this as "paedo protection" as will doubtlessly happen.

[Frankie LiDeo]

Originally Posted by LesMTS

If you think that's the point I was making then you're way wide of the mark, but can be forgiven because a large number of otherwise intelligent, rational people seem to suffer from some kind of brain spasm when this subject is brought up.
That's one quote from a wider argument, the point of which was to put forward my opinion that what goes on in someone's head, whatever that may be, is morally neutral. Morally neutral doesn't necessarily mean they should be encouraged or that they shouldn't be discouraged, just that they shouldn't be subject to punishment.
No-one's sticking up for child abusers here.

Regarding the subject of this thread, he's obviously putting forward some opinions which definitely should be challenged, but he's neither been accused of nor charged with any crime and I think it's valuable (and fairly ballsy of him) that he's willing to articulately and rationally discuss his opinions. It's pretty sad that his willingness to do so is met with "yaaaaaahhhheeeeeeeaaaaargrgggghh BURN HIM, KILL HIM yeaaaarrrrrhhjjjjgghhh FROTH FROTH FROTH". We can learn from him and we're better placed to discourage and challenge him (and others with similar views) if we can sit and hear them out.
Then no-one needs to get burned, and we can save the wood for a barbeque.

In fact, I think anyone who would take satisfaction or enjoyment from seeing him burned is at least as fucked up in the head as he is himself. But, hey, as long as you're only imagining him being burned or talking about how ace it would be, I wouldn't want to see you punished for it.

So, anway, go ahead and misread all of this as "paedo protection" as will doubtlessly happen.

Couldn't agree more without sliding from my seat.

[Posh]

Originally Posted by Draven

it's more the fact I was awaiting the arrival of the usual suspects to argue that this man does not deserve scorn, and they express sympathy for him.

I feel the same degree of sympathy towards people who feel attracted to children as I do anyone with a mental illness.