| Notices | Welcome to the Altnation forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Literature, Books & Performing Arts Books, poetry, theatre & opera are just the beginning. |  | |
27th October 2005, 3:00pm
|
#1 | | Goned
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,177
| Dan Brown sued Quote: |
The author of The Da Vinci Code is being sued by two men claiming he stole their ideas for his best-selling novel. Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh are suing the world's highest-paid writer, Dan Brown, over allegations that he lifted central themes from their non-fiction book. In their 1982 work, The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, the authors explore theories that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married and had a child together. They also propose that the direct descendents of that child are still alive today - the key concept behind the Dan Brown novel.
| http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...454039,00.html
I've been waiting for this...read the books by Baigent and Leigh years and it was obvious where Brown got his story from. He's even been filmed saying that his story is based on thier first book. Well he claims its based on a true story which if you only read B & L's first book you might take that from it but when you read thier follow up books they admit theyve been tricked by folk.
I'll be interested to see just how much cash they get if they win though... |
| |
27th October 2005, 4:28pm
|
#2 | | Eternally clueless one
Join Date: May 2004 Location: in my house
Posts: 5,655
| Re: Dan Brown sued *falls over laughing*
serves that bastard right, making so much money off other folks work. and doing it with such a badly written book. |
| |
27th October 2005, 7:22pm
|
#3 | | Hammer Smashed Face
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Airstrip One
Posts: 29,032
| Re: Dan Brown sued I can't say I'm in the least bit disappointed about this. |
| |
27th October 2005, 7:41pm
|
#4 | | 50ft Queenie
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Fascination Street
Posts: 8,877
| Re: Dan Brown sued Doesn't he actually pay homage to that at some point in the book though? Like, not in any prelude, in the actual story?
I woulda thought that would've had a decent impact on their sales. |
| |
27th October 2005, 7:52pm
|
#5 | | Twilight Of The Gods
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Rutherglen
Posts: 1,071
| Re: Dan Brown sued Hahaha, omg, EVERYONE knew that theory even BEFORE Holy Blood Holy Grail was written!
Fuckin arsepieces.
Although...The Da Vinci Code was ALOT more interesting.....
__________________ Baby Let Me Sing You A Scary Song... |
| |
27th October 2005, 8:45pm
|
#6 | | ...
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: London
Posts: 6,582
| Re: Dan Brown sued I was hoping this thread was just going to say "... for being pish".  |
| |
27th October 2005, 9:04pm
|
#7 | | John Ringo
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 14,066
| Re: Dan Brown sued Idiots. The lot of you.
Good books, good author. 'roon ye's. |
| |
27th October 2005, 9:47pm
|
#8 | | Goned
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,177
| Re: Dan Brown sued Quote: |
Originally Posted by Bred_For_War Hahaha, omg, EVERYONE knew that theory even BEFORE Holy Blood Holy Grail was written! | The whole point of the holy blood and the holy grail was thatthey were trying to prove it. It wasnt until the follow up books came out that you found out they were being tricked. It reads more like a mystery story of how they were tricked rather than about the holy bloodline of christ. |
| |
27th October 2005, 9:47pm
|
#9 | | Hammer Smashed Face
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Airstrip One
Posts: 29,032
| Re: Dan Brown sued Quote: |
Originally Posted by Dyno Good books, good author. | No on both counts.
If the Spice Girls taught society one thing, it's that popular does not equal good. |
| |
27th October 2005, 9:50pm
|
#10 | | John Ringo
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 14,066
| Re: Dan Brown sued Shut up. |
| |
27th October 2005, 9:53pm
|
#11 | | 50ft Queenie
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Fascination Street
Posts: 8,877
| Re: Dan Brown sued Quote: |
Originally Posted by Semprini No on both counts.
If the Spice Girls taught society one thing, it's that popular does not equal good. | True.
"Spice Girls" being interchangable with Bridget Jones and Christian Bale.
I didn't mind the book (nice easy holiday read) but it certainly doesn't merit the hype. |
| |
27th October 2005, 9:56pm
|
#12 | | John Ringo
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 14,066
| Re: Dan Brown sued Clean out your mouth, Christian Bale...SOAP AND WATER! |
| |
27th October 2005, 9:57pm
|
#13 | | 50ft Queenie
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Fascination Street
Posts: 8,877
| Re: Dan Brown sued I knew that'd annoy everyone.
He just plain overacts. |
| |
27th October 2005, 9:58pm
|
#14 | | whispering eye Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Polmont
Posts: 19,107
| Re: Dan Brown sued Quote: |
Originally Posted by Rowsbette True.
"Spice Girls" being interchangable with Bridget Jones and Christian Bale.
I didn't mind the book (nice easy holiday read) but it certainly doesn't merit the hype. | Sarah is on fire tonight. Sooo true...good book, nice theory, made me go "eh, the catholic church is a bit shit then" but that's about it. Saw that programme about people who believed it was the gospel truth and travelled aroudn the world to find out if it was true. obbers all of them  |
| |
27th October 2005, 9:59pm
|
#15 | | John Ringo
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 14,066
| Re: Dan Brown sued Quote: |
Originally Posted by Rowsbette I knew that'd annoy everyone.
He just plain overacts. | Only seen Batman Returns then, aye? |
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |