Ah very good, trying to mask your changing point by making presumptions about the other

.
Quote:
|
Adopting the "they're highlighting black players contribution to English football for the wrong reasons" stance is completely missing the point
|
No, its not missing the point. One of your ORIGINAL points in this thread, was that John Barnes and a whole load of black players were left out of this DVD because the FA don't like their skin colour. They have now been included, which has been done to appease people who saw it purely as a racist snub and not a simple misjudgement by the
programme makers (note how it's NOT THE FA :-\). They've not been put in for their ability, but because they're black. In other words - "they're highlighting black players contribution to English football for the wrong reasons."
Quote:
|
You keep talking about colour but fail to incorporate the player's ABILITY into this debate.
|
I keep talking about colour due to this -
Quote:
|
The English FA is run by elderly OAPs who use language behind closed doors that would put Big Ron to shame. Thats why no black players were included.
|
Also note the title of the thread please. If you had made the thread rubbishing the programme maker's decision to leave Barnes etc out, and based it on purely ability you wouldn't have much quarrel. The fact is you've decided to mix it in with insinuations that it was done for racist reasons, which it seems to me is ridiculous and why I object to your argument. There are plenty of reasons why players of ability (of any colour) may have been left out of this video, whether rightly or wrongly.
Quote:
|
Your media-informed, view-du-jour is actually ill placed in this thread because you are wrong.
|
I don't base my argument on what the current flavour of the day is. If they happen to be the same, so be it. Get used to living in a world where your thoughts, just because they are not "media-informed & view-du-jour", aren't always going to be right (Y).