| Notices | Welcome to the Altnation forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Movies Seen a movie, Loved it, Liked it, Hated it...Tell us all, here! Also gossip about the stars and new releases. |  | |
6th July 2008, 10:46pm
|
#31 | | The Persecutor
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Gettin fingered
Posts: 18,216
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) I haven't seen this yet but the script this was adapted from sounds a helluva lot more interesting than the finished feature. |
| |
7th July 2008, 1:36am
|
#32 | | Wench
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: clydebank
Posts: 2,766
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxglove and The Mist for what I understand is a really really dark ending. | if by dark you mean funny, then yes. yes it is.
that whole film was a pisstake through and through.
__________________ At least I've enough depth to know how shallow I am. |
| |
7th July 2008, 6:53pm
|
#33 | | claire18
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Outside Glasgow
Posts: 1,964
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) Went and seen this yesterday and highly recommend that people go and see it, it made a child cry in the cinema!!!
__________________ "If you're frightened of dying and you're holding on you will see devils tearing you're life away, if you've made you're peace then the devils are really angels freeing you from the earth" |
| |
7th July 2008, 8:24pm
|
#34 | | Wench
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: clydebank
Posts: 2,766
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) that film was kinda awesome.
"homo, homo in red, norwegien homo"
heh.
__________________ At least I've enough depth to know how shallow I am. |
| |
8th July 2008, 12:08am
|
#35 | | Super Discunt
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,782
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) I liked this, it was different to what I expected. |
| |
8th July 2008, 10:09am
|
#36 | | Here comes a special boy.
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Achewood
Posts: 778
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) Liked this film alot, some class lines from Big Willie and the third act was nowhere near the disaster some folk were making it out to be.
__________________ "Illusions, Michael! Tricks are something a whore does for money... Or cocaine!" |
| |
8th July 2008, 10:33am
|
#37 | | Is Your Da
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Glasgow
Posts: 8,217
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) theonehanded baddy was a wank stain of a character, bad acting from him anda poor villain.
aside from that i enjoyed the movie, although it is pissing me off not knowing who hancock and mary are, as folk such as them would obviosly have names (hercules, athena, Zeus even!!)
would have enjoyed if it was at least attempted to tie in with mythology. |
| |
8th July 2008, 2:51pm
|
#38 | | Aff ra sauce
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Paisley
Posts: 3,579
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) At least they explained away Hancock's name with the backstory about the hospital discharge.
__________________ ·--=[Doogie]=--·
If you can read this, my sig fell off. |
| |
9th July 2008, 9:55am
|
#39 | | doon satans alley.
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: avec moomaw
Posts: 30,056
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) Predictable mince.
If theyd made it a funny kids film it wouldve been good, same goes for a dark superhero film.
The two just dont mix.
__________________ Quote: |
She's built like a steakhouse, but she handles like a bistro.
| |
| |
9th July 2008, 3:08pm
|
#40 | | claire18
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Outside Glasgow
Posts: 1,964
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) Quote:
Originally Posted by Ness theonehanded baddy was a wank stain of a character, bad acting from him anda poor villain.
aside from that i enjoyed the movie, although it is pissing me off not knowing who hancock and mary are, as folk such as them would obviosly have names (hercules, athena, Zeus even!!)
would have enjoyed if it was at least attempted to tie in with mythology. | Did ya download it?
__________________ "If you're frightened of dying and you're holding on you will see devils tearing you're life away, if you've made you're peace then the devils are really angels freeing you from the earth" |
| |
25th July 2008, 12:30pm
|
#41 | | Better not to err
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Glesgae
Posts: 28,398
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) I utterly loved this movie. I can totally understand why comic-book fans are dubious of Will Smith as a superhero, and Will Smith fans will despair of the almost complete lack of jokes in the second half of the movie, but I would call this the comic book movie of the year at the very least.
Movies based on comic books have definitely started to improve over the last decade, with studios looking to what in the comic book format makes the stories work so succesfully (The three act episodic format is a good example. Both Lost and Heroes consistently incorporate this.) rather than just buying a license, sewing a costume and dropping the characters into the middle of blockbusters. Batman Begins, Iron Man and X-Men are all good examples of this, taking the movie story formats and stripping the unnecessary fat and backstory from them, leaving evocative set-pieces and letting the characters tell their own stories, or sometimes, most tellingly, not.
Up 'till now I have scoffed when people talk of movies "establishing franchises", mainly because it only seems to get brought up as an excuse for other parts of the film which are lacking and/or substandard, but I can honestly say that I would happily see them make several sequels to this. Quote:
Originally Posted by Ness theonehanded baddy was a wank stain of a character, bad acting from him anda poor villain.
aside from that i enjoyed the movie, although it is pissing me off not knowing who hancock and mary are, as folk such as them would obviosly have names (hercules, athena, Zeus even!!)
would have enjoyed if it was at least attempted to tie in with mythology. | Nah, I loved the fact that it deliberately left vague with only specious ties to Roman, Greek and Judeo-Christian mythology.
If you really want concrete anwers, him being the hero (Out of all the 'gods' he is THE hero, according to Mary), the 'insurance policy of the gods' and the whole doomed lovers angle points to him being either Thor or Herakles. |
| |
25th July 2008, 2:53pm
|
#42 | | Soberesque
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Kirkintilloch
Posts: 250
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) I want to see more in the way of Norse/Greek/Roman mythology in films...films where a shitload of Gods fight each other, as opposed to one God lording it over everyone, sitting in the sky and tallying the fall of every sparrow* because he's bored/lonely. Fight! Fight! Fight!
*paraquoted from Carl Sagan. |
| |
6th September 2008, 7:03pm
|
#43 | | Is Your Da
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Glasgow
Posts: 8,217
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkMono I utterly loved this movie. I can totally understand why comic-book fans are dubious of Will Smith as a superhero, and Will Smith fans will despair of the almost complete lack of jokes in the second half of the movie, but I would call this the comic book movie of the year at the very least.
Movies based on comic books have definitely started to improve over the last decade, with studios looking to what in the comic book format makes the stories work so succesfully (The three act episodic format is a good example. Both Lost and Heroes consistently incorporate this.) rather than just buying a license, sewing a costume and dropping the characters into the middle of blockbusters. Batman Begins, Iron Man and X-Men are all good examples of this, taking the movie story formats and stripping the unnecessary fat and backstory from them, leaving evocative set-pieces and letting the characters tell their own stories, or sometimes, most tellingly, not.
Up 'till now I have scoffed when people talk of movies "establishing franchises", mainly because it only seems to get brought up as an excuse for other parts of the film which are lacking and/or substandard, but I can honestly say that I would happily see them make several sequels to this.
Nah, I loved the fact that it deliberately left vague with only specious ties to Roman, Greek and Judeo-Christian mythology.
If you really want concrete anwers, him being the hero (Out of all the 'gods' he is THE hero, according to Mary), the 'insurance policy of the gods' and the whole doomed lovers angle points to him being either Thor or Herakles. | Im not a fan of not knowing, hence why i was annoyed at it, but then again its more ground to expand if there is a sequel.
PS this kind of praise from markmono means this movie deserves an oscar of some sort. |
| |
6th September 2008, 7:04pm
|
#44 | | Better not to err
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Glesgae
Posts: 28,398
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) As far as comic-book movies go, its a masterpiece of the form. |
| |
6th September 2008, 8:11pm
|
#45 | | Is Your Da
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Glasgow
Posts: 8,217
| Re: Hancock (Will Smith, Peter Berg) is it a comic book movie though? i heard it was just a script waiting for about 9 year or something?not heard if the comic. |
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | |