We're well aware of that

There won't just be the official campaigns. There is a hell of a lot of No to NUS groups that can muster a flying picket, should the need arise.
As I said above, the NUS are said to have a lot of money set aside for Glasgow, since the UoG name carries a lot of weight. It's not going to be a fair fight, but there is a lot of strong feeling against the NUS in Glasgow and a lot of groups that would come off worse under the NUS and NUSSEL.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cookie I'd actually be tempted to get involved in this, you wouldn't happen to know where I can find more info about the pros and cons of joining the NUS would you Hammer? |
Certainly. For the pros, have a look at the NUS website. They love to toot they're own horn about how great they are.
For a negitive look, the
Students Against NUS at Edinburgh (SANE) website has some good info, as does this article from the
St. Andrews Uni magazine.
Personally, my arguments against joining the NUS are as follows, I dislike the centralisation, party politisism and opportunism of the NUS. If you wish to talk to a member of the SRC, then they'll be in they're office. As like as not an elected NUS rep on a sabbatical will be hidden away in a central office somewhere. The upper-eclechons of the NUS are also seen as a fast track way to get put forward for a Labour seat.
There is a threat to the Unions from the NUS, namely they may be forced to switch to the NUSSEL buying consortium (as opposed to the non-NUS Northern Services group). The long and the short of this would mean that what we could stock would be controlled by an England based group and that the QM and the GU would be very small voices in it (as opposed to Northern Services, which we have a good influence in). The QM and the GU would most likely end up stocking Carling and Carlsberg as the standard and premium lagers, with several other beverages being replaced with alternatives. It is also likely that bar prices would increase.
It should be noted that the Unions would remain completely under the control of their independent, elected Boards of Management unless they held referendums which voted to either become part of a Student Association or join the NUS as an individual body.
I have a few more points which I'll bring up later once I've done some fact finding, but there's also possible risks to the survival of certain clubs and societies on campus (notably the International Students, the LGBT and Women's Society), which may be grouped into new NUS groups if the referendum passes.